The Phoenix has risen from the ashes.
So the folks at SM have decided to let me back on. For what reason I don't know. I still intend on stating my opinion like the rest of the users of that site, I'll even not respond to the repetitive snide jabs coming from these unknown assailants. The SM people have remained true to their commitment to free speech, and in doing so, have kept it real.
And for that I thank them. But the truisms of what I've stated time and time again on that site, and this one, still stand. No one has been able to even come close to disproving my central claim, namely those describing female hypocrisy in dating (as defined in US/western dating paradigms)
So. Get ready for round 2. It seems SM is ready.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
7 comments:
man, the reason I hated on you was because you argue like cap'n Ed Morrisey and other wingnuts regularly destroyed on sadlyno.com.
your exchanges with AK and manju were pretty much unreadable vivisections of the english language in a medium which does not lend itself to accurate portrayals of tone, intent and sometimes factual content.
I'm not dancing the macarena but am doubleplusunbelievably happy that discussion doesn't get derailed by your trademark, "i ain't getting any/as much as I think I should, so desi girls are whores for the white man" comments.
If you read some of the more intelligent PUA theorists, like Roissy (with whom I do not agree on nearly everything) you'd recognize your own comments as displaying nearly all the hallmarks of a drifting-further-into-misogyny beta boy.
http://roissy.wordpress.com/
betas argue about why exactly their sex lives are shitty online--alphas don't.
"your exchanges with AK and manju were pretty much unreadable vivisections of the english language in a medium which does not lend itself to accurate portrayals of tone, intent and sometimes factual content."
And what pray-tell do you think my intent is, other than to indicate social forces and their effect on men and women in our community. And Id like you to show where I was unfactual in any presentation.
"I'm not dancing the macarena but am doubleplusunbelievably happy that discussion doesn't get derailed by your trademark, "i ain't getting any/as much as I think I should, so desi girls are whores for the white man""
Again you miss the point, Im talking about the effects of living in a white dominated society where white males are presented as the zenith of "manhood", not just "attractiveness" if more Indian (and other races) women saw this for what it is, we could have an honest discussion, about why desi women gravitate towards white men in the first place.
"you'd recognize your own comments as displaying nearly all the hallmarks of a drifting-further-into-misogyny beta boy. "
Wonderful, so its misogyny to point out differences that benefit women?
"betas argue about why exactly their sex lives are shitty online--alphas don't."
I never said I was alpha, in fact I think money and looks (two things which I have a basic amount, but not a surfeit of) are directly proportional to alpha-ness. But I do have truth. something which you (and for a brief time period, SM, seemed to not value too much)
For example, take the thread that got me banned. I caught AK in her attempt to use my words against me, so she backtracked and basically implied she wasn't trying to use my words against me.
This was the discussion regarding excessive expenditure (and its motivation) by many desi parents on weddings.
""I'm not dancing the macarena but am doubleplusunbelievably happy that discussion doesn't get derailed by your trademark"
Like I told SM, getting 'derailed' is a function of more than one person. perhaps my trademark "derails" because the things I say are true, and to the people reading it, the truth hurts, so they feel compelled to respond, even though it might be off topic.
Good to see you return on SM and here, even though I didn't agree with much of your worldview..you were interesting to read.
Question: is there any we can send you a personal email, i have a question to pose to you
two things.
1. identify yourself to some extent, a handle, a codename, something.
2. pose it here, I have nothing to hide, if the question is extremely personal I wont answer it.
(ok actually 3 things)
If you find me an interesting read, then let the folks at SM know that.
"even though I didn't agree with much of your worldview."
Most people don't. I bring too much truth to the table too quickly.
Post a Comment