Tuesday, October 6, 2009

Shout out to AK

Hey AK, if you're still out there. Here's a shout out to you.

If there's one chick I miss from the SM days, it's you.

Wednesday, September 2, 2009

Cognitive Dissonance

Cognitive Dissonance.

Here is an interesting principle, cognitive dissonance, it's the recognition of two contradictory perceptions, and it usually yields to amending one of the perceptions to become more resonant with the other. The perception that is amended is usually the subordinate of the two.

A very common example, buyer's remorse: Most people have the perception that their purchasing decisions are prudent, wise, and well thought out. Hence, when they spent large amounts of money on something that doesn't yield immediate value, they begin to artificially "bump up" the value of that thing, in order to avoid the dissonance with the stronger perception: I'm a wise purchaser.

Another example is investor strategy and loss. People believe they are wise stock investors, so they put money into a stock, it goes down, and they put more, and repeat the process - all because there's an underlying belief they are good investors, and the stock will eventually turn up. But what ends up happening? either you cut your losses, or go down with the ship.

There is a direct parallel here with women, and their choice of men. While it's clear society privileges women to choose their mates, it implies to most women they are innately better selectors (ie men are superficial, only care about looks, women are more mature, and choose based on personality!) This makes women convince themselves they are great selectors of the men they choose to have in their lives, so much that it becomes a firmly rooted principle.

Therefore, when guys treat them poorly, or is a general prick, they bump up their value, as it resolves the cognitive dissonance with the underlying principle they already have: I'm a smart chooser. Ultimately of course, it's the women that suffer by clinging to the belief they are "good selectors" - and sadly many go down with the ship.

Whats the solution?

It all comes back to equality really. If women actually work to erase the outdated gender model that they are "selectors" and it's the man's job to "chase" them, then *they* will ultimately benefit as they won't be constantly reinforcing to themselves they are "good" at mate selection, and perverting reality in their own minds, in order to avoid the cognitive dissonance.
A societal pressure for men to approach, and be more 'pro-active', has a flip-side:

A society that pressures women to be constant receivers of that information, and by extension, skilled evaluators - which evidence clearly states, they are not. So for their own good, women must actively choose to believe in equality thoroughly and completely, without exceptions and selectivity many normally apply.

*as a side note, if history is any guide, you can never convince ANYONE to undergo a course of action because it's morally correct (ie. pursue a just cause for equality, for equalities sake), rather you have to show how a course of action ( no matter how correct it is, in *principle*), will directly benefit THEM.

And there you go.

Monday, August 31, 2009

A great shirt.

a great shirt.

nothing more to be really said here.

Saturday, August 15, 2009

A confessional - justice

I felt a little bad doing this, but finally I did it.

At a public library computer some desi girl left her email logged in, and I found she applied for a job. The guy who wrote her back said something like

"every time I come into the bank you have such a great smile, and that gives me a great smile"

so I wrote him back (As her)

"If I get the job, you'll walk away with more than just a big smile. if you know what I mean. hint hint, call or write xoxox"

Then I clicked send. I felt a little bad, then I checked this girl on facebook, and saw her picture. a total hottie, probably reaped off the fat of the land for a good while now - gaining favors, free meals, extra attention, telling good guys to f*ck off just based on their looks - so this small amount of justice was deserved. Heck who knows, maybe she was thinking that all the way, did her deed and now has the job!

Maybe I did her a favor! that would be the ultimate irony.

Wednesday, August 5, 2009

a wake up call.

If this isn't a wake up call to push for a society that treats men and women equal.. I don't know what is.


Now I know what you're thinking.. "This guy is sick! he's a lunatic! he's a ... whatever" and yes, anyone who's willing to take their own life, and that of others, certainly is all of those things... but look what got him there...

a society that positions women in such a point of power, where a guy feels he has to take a gun to match that power.

This should be a wake up call. Now instead of arguing with me, how about we try and figure something out to stop this sorta thing.. hmmm?

By the way, I'm sure what this guy certainly did NOT need, was women telling him 'ugh you're so bitter , you're just angry, you're just this, you're just that!"

Thursday, July 30, 2009

for minority success in politics and public spheres...

A few things have to happen

1. A white person has to fuck up MAJORLY. I mean so majorly, like almost bankrupting the country.
2. Another group of whites have to want to look like they are "true liberals" and believe in "true racial equality" and get
behind that minority.
3. The minority has to have *some* appeal to white america, in some way shape or form. Even Obama falls under this category.

Monday, July 20, 2009

Oh. and the best one.

First they ignore you… ( no one responds at SM )

then they laugh at you… ( object of mockery at SM )

then they fight you … (banned from SM, deal with punks like 'pot meet kettle')

then you win … (stay tuned - one day, males and females will be treated equal in this society)

Sunday, July 19, 2009

Some great quotes.

"Great spirits have always encountered violent oppostion from mediocre minds."
-Albert Einstein

"He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it. He who accepts evil without protesting against it is really cooperating with it."
-Martin Luther King, Jr.

"Even if you are a minority of one, the truth is the truth. "
-M.K Gandhi.

So. the quest for true equality between men and women is ongoing.

Friday, July 10, 2009

Obama's "staring" at a girls ass.

So the fuck what?

This article clears him of it:


Anyway, this just illustrates white privilege in the earnest. Bush or Clinton could've fucking grabbed the girl's ass and it would've just been written off as the frat boy acting up.

Anyway, lets move on to the actual girl. First of all, she probably enjoys having her ass stared at, why else would she even wear a dress like that?

I find it interesting that women enjoy using their sexuality to their advantage but then cry foul when men actually respond to it. You can't meter when and where your sexuality gets used, if you "flaunt" it, don't be surprised when it actually takes effect!

Friday, March 6, 2009

An open call to all detractors

I am temporarily lifting the comment moderation, in the off chance that anyone is reading this, I'd like to ask all a question.

many people from SepiaMutiny have said that there were multiple calls for me to be banned, well, you all got your wish, they thoroughly dislike me over there, if a klan member wanted to do a post, they'd probably allow that over allowing me back on.

But I invite you to come here and share if you actually did send SM a letter urging my post. They said many people did, I want to hear from you.

Monday, March 2, 2009


Is this blog dead?

Saturday, February 28, 2009

This is actually pretty good

Yogi B.

Sad, but true.

Yet another reason, why beautiful women are quite possibly the dumbest creatures to exist on the planet.

How does one go from this?


to this?


Thank you, it's just sad but true.

Friday, February 13, 2009

F**K Valentine's Day.

F#@^K Valentine's Day.

There, thats the title all you people expected. but this post isn't about valentine's day or why I hate it, really. I'm pretty much indifferent to valentine's day, my problem is with any kind of social order that tells me I *have* to do something , on *THAT* particular day, and if I don't I'm a bad mate. To me, Valentine's day has the position of the SATs, as part of a college application. How in the world can you reduce 4 years of high school study, extra curriculars, and other activities to a single test score, taken on a single day of heightened scrutiny, and pressure?

In the same way, how can my entire worth be reduced to my actions on one day, that's been hyper commercialized ad nauseum. I won't even get into the argument that this holiday is rooted in western society, from middle ages, and the concept of "courtly love." A time period which, if the men were to ask women to hold THEIR end of the bargain, they would cry sexism before the.. you know what comes you know where.

St. Valentine had nothing to do with romance, love or anything even remotely close to it.

And never mind how it's just commercialized into bullshit fear, where if you don't get a girl a rose, a card, or take her to dinner, or any other crap like that you're just put into a state of FEAR.

But this post is about events that have transpired in the weeks before valentines day, and a protest avalentineforindia.blogspot.com"

I had read their postings, and posted a suggestion that they change the name, for their own benefit, and ability to connect with the silent majority within the country.

Some ridiculously misguided, anonymous prick, responded with (I'm eliminating some of the post):

Modern democracy, personal freedom, adult franchise, written constitution, scientific enquiry- all are ideas that came to us, at least in the recent times, from the west.

Our founding fathers, when debating our constitution in the Constituent Assembly were willing to adopt these. There was no cry against these being western. The first 4 words of our constitution, and in my opinion the most magical, the most powerful ones- are a straight lift from the US constitution that was written 250 years before ours.

In the globalized world, we live in a global culture- it is inevitable and in my view desirable that cultural streams would mix and amalgamate. There is no difference between you- the so called moderate who would rather maintain the status quo because change makes him uncomfortable and the extremist fundamentalist who uses violence to force people to his views. In fact it is people of your ilk, the neo conservatives (if you prefer)who provide the seed bed for extremists to develop and provide them with the intellectual and philosophical sustenance.

Step out of your shell- do not only tolerate the difference in the other but celebrate it. You don't have to like what the other

Now, I answered back, defending myself against this attack, as person should be allowed to do. The post was deleted and I was met with "you can't pee all over our blog" I actually saw myself as cleaning up the pee.

But fine, I stopped expecting unbiased treatment in the blogosphere, so I respectfully asked MANY times for the post (the original post) to be deleted, as I couldn't respond, there was no point in having it up there in the first place. And this request was repeatedly ignored, and I was assured by the blog moderator, the reason for being ignored was the impending protest and the time necessary to spend in preparation. Yes, ok I understand that.

Yet, the requests for deletion were deleted! How much more time does it take to delete the actual post I want eliminated? but they deleted my REQUESTS but nothing else.

Tell me please, how much sense does this make, if they are taking the time to delete my request of deletion... WHY NOT JUST DELETE THE ORIGINAL POST?!?!

It's the height of absurdity, but I guess salivating at the expectation of roses and chocolates could make a person all cooky.

But since I'm not allowed to respond there, I shall respond here:

Modern democracy, personal freedom, adult franchise, written constitution, scientific enquiry- all are ideas that came to us, at least in the recent times, from the west.

American/modern democracy, while it does have some roots in the thoughts of Thomas Paine and other "founding fathers," really had no operational precedent in any part of Europe, which was entirely monarchies. Rather, the first European invaders and squatters, drew upon the Native Americans form of government, most prominently, through the Iroquois League:


It was this entity that eventually became the foundation for the US Constitution.

But even so, lets say for arguments sake that India owes the west, in particular, the United States for its democratic ideals. What does this have to do with importing American/Western views on courtship and courtly love? Absolutely none. All it does, is propagate a continued unequal positioning of men and women, one that both men and women should be fighting to erase, if we all want the equality that we say we do.

"There is no difference between you- the so called moderate who would rather maintain the status quo because change makes him uncomfortable and the extremist fundamentalist who uses violence to force people to his views"

Uhh. No in fact that's the entire reason for calling someone a "moderate" is that they do not resort to violence, but believe their viewpoint is one worth merit. Is everyone that is pro-abortion, want to just fuck repeatedly until they die? Is everyone anti-abortion going to blow up a clinic? It's ironic that you make a point like this and then immediately ask me to :

" Step out of your shell- do not only tolerate the difference in the other but celebrate it. "

No, how about you step out of your shell, and stop thinking everything out of the west is inherently better and more fair. I've already shown you how Valentine's Day is rooted simply INEQUALITY, positioning men and women as inherently different. You can't retain a segment of that thought process, and want to eliminate the rest. It's called being selective, and ultimately it's hypocritical.

But I understand that men have to go along with female hypocrisy if we are to ever get any poontang. So I don't blame you for what you think.

Tuesday, February 3, 2009

are you f*cking kidding me?

are yoU FUCKing kidding me?

Nip Tuck, they have an indian character.... and he wants to have his DICK enlarged.. and then have his SON do it?

what the MOTHER FUCK?!?!

Sunday, February 1, 2009


Alright. There's gonna be some changes around here.

Only blog members can comment. I'm sick of this anonymous shit.

I'm going to be more open minded to try and understand opposing points of view.

Tuesday, January 27, 2009

And another thing...

As Valentines Day nears..

99.9% of women I'd say haven't the slightest spiritual bone in their body. That is, they usually are incapable of thinking beyond the physical, and material.

Instead of having their mouths water at roses and heart shaped chocolates, if they thought about the other 364 days of the year, and how they were treated, and didnt let a single rose define the entire year - then maybe they might have a shot at choosing more success driven mates.

Saturday, January 24, 2009

The best line ever.

"Rosa Parks sat so Martin Luther could walk, Martin Luther walked so Barack Obama could run, Barack Obama ran so the children could fly..."


Friday, January 23, 2009

What my point is.

For those who are interested in what my point is.

Equal treatment for everyone.

See? now was that hard?

Saturday, January 17, 2009

I'm rick james bitch.

apparently, this is the only way to really attract women.

*all due respect to mr. james' soul.

Friday, January 16, 2009

An apt analogy.

Each year 40,000 new cinema scripts get registered into the writers guild databanks. 80,000 scrips are penned each year according to some reports. Studios usually do not take unsolicited submissions, unless they have been vetted carefully by an agent, even then, they take thousands of scripts, go through a careful screening process, and make maybe 20 of those into actual films.

How many movies that get made absolutely SUCK? Most of them. So after all that rejecting of submissions, all that careful attention to choosing the best projects, most movies SUCK. and are LOSSES.

See the parallel here?

Women reject 1000's of guys, carefully screen based on all kinds of nonsense. Yet, most of them complain about the relationships they are in. Whats the problem here?

Ladies, care to explain?

Sunday, January 11, 2009

sliced bread had a pretty good run.

I have the best idea.

A social networking site dedicated to matching men and women.

However, a requirement, women that do not judge based on money and looks, rather personality. (you know, how like 90% of the women out there say they behave)


basically guys could log on and find women that are actually honest about what they seek.. and all "dates" require no cross-payment. each person pays for themselves.

Saturday, January 10, 2009

Analyzing female hypocrisy to its core.

Let's re-visit female hypocrisy, and have a look at the root of the behavior. Simply put, hypocrisy is, by definition:

a pretense of having a virtuous character, moral or religious beliefs or principles, etc., that one does not really possess.


So in essence, it's the feigned practice and ownership of certain character beliefs and traits, that one does not possess. How is this lack of possession ascertained? Do people walk around with ID cards carrying the information of all the beliefs or principles they adhere to? No, it's through action and behavior, we induct backwards to underlying principles they stem from.

How does this manifest in the majority of women in the world? Well, in a western dating approach, when women believe that men should do the approaching, men should pay for dates, men should act as providers, etc.. but simultaneously profess a belief in equality of the genders and sexes. This amounts to hypocrisy. and here's how it's explained away.

Women, dont actually want equality in all things. they only want equality in certain things that they've been denied and prevented, from having because they are female. ie. voting, jobs, salary, etc...

However, when it comes to things that society entitles them to have, there's no questioning at all. essentially they takes what they can get. But what they don't realize is, the entitlement is historically rooted in the same "preventative" discrimination they stand against - and herein lies the essence of the hypocrisy. So a man paying for a woman exists as tradition because she was thought of incapable of working and making money for herself in a "man's world". So in the entitlement, is the original discriminatory underlying principle, a woman accepting money/payment/etc.. for social interactions is basically saying, "I am incapable of existing on my own, as an independent individual, and am dependent"

So, again it comes down to rejecting discriminatory practices across the board. sexist is sexist, irrespective of the direction.

Sunday, January 4, 2009

No. Seriously?

I just saw a commercial for this product


Seriously? Has research into female "beautification" products gone to such a level? Is there anything you can trust about a woman when you meet her? Not her looks, her body, with all kinds of slim down this and tuck in's there, Cosmetic science has made 40 year olds look like 25 year olds. Her words? if they even approach something barely resembling the truth, I'd be shocked out of my wits.

If 10% of this effort was spent on, ohh I dunno curing a terminal disease, or I dunno, bringing equality to all people on earth, you know those trivial ol' little things, maybe this world might be a better place

Friday, January 2, 2009

Racists to America: It's 2009, and we're still going strong

Racists kick off 2009 the right way


They should sue. What better way to prove their commitment to America, and show the world their true American-ness than by a "frivolous" lawsuit?