Tuesday, January 27, 2009

And another thing...

As Valentines Day nears..

99.9% of women I'd say haven't the slightest spiritual bone in their body. That is, they usually are incapable of thinking beyond the physical, and material.

Instead of having their mouths water at roses and heart shaped chocolates, if they thought about the other 364 days of the year, and how they were treated, and didnt let a single rose define the entire year - then maybe they might have a shot at choosing more success driven mates.

Saturday, January 24, 2009

The best line ever.

"Rosa Parks sat so Martin Luther could walk, Martin Luther walked so Barack Obama could run, Barack Obama ran so the children could fly..."


Friday, January 23, 2009

What my point is.

For those who are interested in what my point is.

Equal treatment for everyone.

See? now was that hard?

Saturday, January 17, 2009

I'm rick james bitch.

apparently, this is the only way to really attract women.

*all due respect to mr. james' soul.

Friday, January 16, 2009

An apt analogy.

Each year 40,000 new cinema scripts get registered into the writers guild databanks. 80,000 scrips are penned each year according to some reports. Studios usually do not take unsolicited submissions, unless they have been vetted carefully by an agent, even then, they take thousands of scripts, go through a careful screening process, and make maybe 20 of those into actual films.

How many movies that get made absolutely SUCK? Most of them. So after all that rejecting of submissions, all that careful attention to choosing the best projects, most movies SUCK. and are LOSSES.

See the parallel here?

Women reject 1000's of guys, carefully screen based on all kinds of nonsense. Yet, most of them complain about the relationships they are in. Whats the problem here?

Ladies, care to explain?

Sunday, January 11, 2009

sliced bread had a pretty good run.

I have the best idea.

A social networking site dedicated to matching men and women.

However, a requirement, women that do not judge based on money and looks, rather personality. (you know, how like 90% of the women out there say they behave)


basically guys could log on and find women that are actually honest about what they seek.. and all "dates" require no cross-payment. each person pays for themselves.

Saturday, January 10, 2009

Analyzing female hypocrisy to its core.

Let's re-visit female hypocrisy, and have a look at the root of the behavior. Simply put, hypocrisy is, by definition:

a pretense of having a virtuous character, moral or religious beliefs or principles, etc., that one does not really possess.


So in essence, it's the feigned practice and ownership of certain character beliefs and traits, that one does not possess. How is this lack of possession ascertained? Do people walk around with ID cards carrying the information of all the beliefs or principles they adhere to? No, it's through action and behavior, we induct backwards to underlying principles they stem from.

How does this manifest in the majority of women in the world? Well, in a western dating approach, when women believe that men should do the approaching, men should pay for dates, men should act as providers, etc.. but simultaneously profess a belief in equality of the genders and sexes. This amounts to hypocrisy. and here's how it's explained away.

Women, dont actually want equality in all things. they only want equality in certain things that they've been denied and prevented, from having because they are female. ie. voting, jobs, salary, etc...

However, when it comes to things that society entitles them to have, there's no questioning at all. essentially they takes what they can get. But what they don't realize is, the entitlement is historically rooted in the same "preventative" discrimination they stand against - and herein lies the essence of the hypocrisy. So a man paying for a woman exists as tradition because she was thought of incapable of working and making money for herself in a "man's world". So in the entitlement, is the original discriminatory underlying principle, a woman accepting money/payment/etc.. for social interactions is basically saying, "I am incapable of existing on my own, as an independent individual, and am dependent"

So, again it comes down to rejecting discriminatory practices across the board. sexist is sexist, irrespective of the direction.

Sunday, January 4, 2009

No. Seriously?

I just saw a commercial for this product


Seriously? Has research into female "beautification" products gone to such a level? Is there anything you can trust about a woman when you meet her? Not her looks, her body, with all kinds of slim down this and tuck in's there, Cosmetic science has made 40 year olds look like 25 year olds. Her words? if they even approach something barely resembling the truth, I'd be shocked out of my wits.

If 10% of this effort was spent on, ohh I dunno curing a terminal disease, or I dunno, bringing equality to all people on earth, you know those trivial ol' little things, maybe this world might be a better place

Friday, January 2, 2009

Racists to America: It's 2009, and we're still going strong

Racists kick off 2009 the right way


They should sue. What better way to prove their commitment to America, and show the world their true American-ness than by a "frivolous" lawsuit?